Being a pirate probably really sucked.
Your odds of profiting from a raid were dodgy. Some of the victims fought back. The authorities might show up. Don't even start with me about the storms.
If you were a pirate captain....whooo. Do you know how hard it is to get good help? How expensive to refit and provision a ship? And where do you store your money so that you don't lose it and can afford to pay crew if the raid didn't go well this time?
Especially when you are constantly on the run?
Wouldn't it be great to have a place to go? Wouldn't have to be fancy. Just some basic support to help you refit the ship, provision it and hire crew for your next raid on the coastal settlements.
This is what NIGMS has been doing with their strategy of getting sustenance grant funding to as many of their people as possible. Keep lots of privateer crews, sorry, labs, alive...but just barely. Then you know they will launch raids on the other ICs to bring in their booty. Which they will spend a lot of back at the pirate stronghold.
The very first rule of PI/mentorship is get your trainees first author publications.
This is the thing of biggest lasting career impact that you can determine almost with absolute control.
Yes, things happen but if you are not getting the vast majority of your trainees first author pubs you are screwing up as a mentor.
So. 2017 is about to start. Do you have a publication plan for all of your postdocs and later-stage graduate students?
Obviously I am in favor of active management of trainees' publishing plans. I assume some favor a more hands-off approach?
"Let the postdoc figure it out" has an appeal. Makes them earn those pubs and sets them up for later hard times.
The problem is, if they fail to get a publication, or enough, their career takes a bad hit. So ability to grunt it out isn't ever used.
When a lever of power unexpectedly extends into your operant chamber, press it.
That is what they have done to get to where they are. Constantly.
I know it irritates you that the world works this way. It irritates me too. This irritation changes nothing.
Take the opportunity. If needs be, remind yourself of all those times the system screwed you over. Let this make up for that.
Press the damn lever.
Take care of yourself and your family first, folks. The next four years are going to be a bumpy ride for decent people.
Secure your situation. Take the job, take the money. Hunker down.
I really hate to say this but lab-wise it might be time to trim the sails too. Play for no-cost extensions of that grant, no telling what the glorious future of Precision Medicine Initiatives, BRAINI and the like holds for regular R01 budgets.
I recently attended a scientific meeting with which I've had an uncomfortable relationship for years. When I first heard about the topic domain and focus of this meeting as a trainee I was amazed. "This is just the right home for me and my interests in science", I thought. And, scientifically this was, and still is, the case.
I should love this meeting and this academic society.
This has not been the case, very likely because of the demographics of the society (guess) in addition to a few other....lets call them unusual academic society tics.
This year was a distinct improvement. It isn't here yet but I can see a youth wave about to crash into the shore. This swell of younger scientists (stretching from postdoc to nearly-tenured) looks more like modern science to me. Demographically, and on many dimensions.
This gives me hope for the future of this academic meeting.
I recently attended a scientific meeting during which it was made clear that their prize for young investigators had an age cutoff of 50 or younger.
Now the award was not literally titled "for Young Investigators" as so many are, but the context was clear. A guy who looks phenotypically like a solidly mid-career, even approaching-senior, was described as a "rising star" by the award presenter.
This is ridiculous.
It is more of this creeping infantilization of generations of scientists by the preceding one (Boomers) or two (preWar) generations. The generations who were Full Professors by age 40.
This is all of a part with grant reviews that wring hands over the "risk" of handing an R01 over to a 30 year old. Or a 38 year old.
I think we need to resist this.
Hold the line at 40 years of age on early-career or young-investigator awards. If your society is such that it only starts the awards at mid-career, make this clear. Call them "established stars" instead of "rising stars".
It's okay. It's perfectly natural and healthy. Everyone does it, you know. I mean, it's not like anyone brags about it but they do it. Regularly. So go ahead and don't feel ashamed.
Continue Reading »
I had the wrong version. Thanks to Jocelyn Kaiser of Science mag for alerting me.
The 21st Century Cures site is here and I think the right version of the bill is here in PDF form.
So. A federal judge* managed to put a hold on Obama's move to increase the threshold for overtime exemption. Very likely any challenge to this will fail to succeed before a new Administration takes over the country. Most would bet there will be no backing for Obama's plans under the new regime.
NIH is planning to steam ahead with their NRSA salary guidelines that met the Obama rule. Workplaces are left in a quandary. Many have announced their policies and issued notification of raises to some employees. Now they are not being forced to do so, at the last hour.
My HR department has signaled no recent changes in plans. Postdocs will get raises up to the Obama threshold. There are some other categories affected but I've seen no announcement of any hold on those plans either.
How about you folks? What are your various HR departments going to do in light of the de facto halt on Obama's plans!
Twenty-nine transgenic mice that two Spanish airlines had refused to transport hitched a ride to the Canary Islands on a military plane Friday and are now at their final destination
Y'all looked away when they stopped shipping purpose bred non-human primate laboratory subjects. "Oh please", you thought, "there is no way anyone gives a care about genetic mouse models".
Guess what? You were wrong and Niemöller's principle rules the day.