Archive for the 'Uncategorized' category

Good problems

Jun 19 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

5 responses so far

FIFA

May 27 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

Can someone explain why the U.S. is wasting a single penny going after corruption in futbol? Nobody gives a fig about soccer in this country. Let the UK or Germans or someone go after these people.

Meanwhile, we should be prosecuting the financial and banking greedholes who crashed the world economy.

23 responses so far

Responses to the NIH RFI on the Emeritus award proposal

May 07 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

Datahound posted the comments he received on Google docs. Go read.

Comment over on DataHound.

No responses yet

More on citation scofflaws

May 07 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

So.

What if you have a habitual offender in your field?

Someone who simply refuses to cite and discuss relevant literature from ten different labs. It isn't personal animus against a single lab at this point. 

Do you take it out on them in your own papers? Reviews? Or just keep giving them harsh reviews? Do you talk to their occasional co-authors that you know well off the record? 

7 responses so far

This is who is leading the fight for your future in science

Mar 27 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

Tweep @MHendr1cks is killing it. The latest.

The PI R01 age distribution looks like the 2010 one from this PPT file.

The "Jedi Council" is, I believe, the ages of the participants in a 2 day workshop convened by Alberts, Kirschner, Tilghman and Varmus as detailed here (see Acknowledgements).

To make this even more interesting, we can look at the 1980-2013 distributional overlay slide.
NIH1980-2013R01AgePIs

In 1980 the 35-40 year old PI demographic was the immediate pre-Boomer generation but oh, just wait. Stepping forward to 1986 we see...
NIH-1986

another little bump. 1986 minus 40 equals the post-WWII definitinal start of the Boomers. These slides illustrate why strict generational definitions are only roughly accurate...so no need to get too fussed about those precise age ranges. Suffice it to say if you were born between about 1940 and 1953 you were in the awesomely lucky zone. Look at how the shoulder in the distribution at age 35 drops off right around 1988-1990 in the slide deck.

61 responses so far

Question of the Day

Mar 22 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

Who ARE these people who imagine only one person thought up some good idea in bioscience?

It's about execution not some random thought you happened to express in passing.

19 responses so far

Should PI or trainee submit the manuscript?

Mar 12 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

I imagine the answers are any of:

Speed.

Control.

It was the project of a trainee now departed.

Trainee not competent* in eyes of PI.

It is actually the PI who leads this particular project.

Lab run like the salt mines, so called trainees treated as labor, not intellectual contributors.

One way the PI feels involved in the actual science. 

Other reasons you can think of, Readers?

__

*to deal with cover letters, selecting editors, etc. The process of submission itself.

44 responses so far

Thought of the Day

Mar 11 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

It is a crying shame that the science blogosphere's favorite Wankees fan, Comradde Physioproffe, does not coach tee ball, Farm or Pinto. 

2 responses so far

Sunday Sermon: Obama has something to say to GenX scientists

Mar 08 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

6 responses so far

Thought of the Day

Feb 20 2015 Published by under Uncategorized

I think I have received at least four NIH grants on the topic of "how in the heck is there very little science done on this entirely obvious (to me) idea?".
Continue Reading »

3 responses so far

Older posts »