It is relatively easy to kill grant applications because the reviewer knows the applicant can always apply again.
Same thing for hiring decisions because surely some lesser University will hire the three other candidates on the short list.
In many tenure cases, the Department knows that this person will get a professorial rank job elsewhere*.
Germain's scheme is going to require peers in the field to pass a death sentence on the career. And to make the numbers add up, there will be a LOT of this.
Those peers know that they themselves will be up for chopping in the next 5-7 years.
I do not foresee much enthusiasm for scoring progress as deficient and this will only grow more intense with each successive 5 year review interval.
*and anyway these are so personal at this point that it is a different matter.