Will you be an angel?

Jun 26 2013 Published by under #FWDAOTI

via a Reader

9 responses so far

  • Ren says:

    Here I thought this blog was about science and whatnot. I understand that the video may have been a spoof, but it's in poor taste. It perpetuates a baseless belief, one not supported in evidence, that pitbulls are vicious attack dogs and killers by nature.

    How this has anything to do with "careerism in science" or "the science of drug use" is beyond me.

  • Beaker says:

    Flame on!

  • DrugMonkey says:

    Oh there's a baseless belief not supported by the evidence afoot, all right.

  • It perpetuates a baseless belief, one not supported in evidence, that pitbulls are vicious attack dogs and killers by nature.

    What you need to understand is that this "DrugMonkey" blogger is actually a bichon apologist. He knows that pit bulls are cute loving harmless creatures who wouldn't hurt a fly except in exceedingly rare cases, and in all of those cases it is clearly nothing more than a case of bad owners. He posts about how dangerous pit bulls are solely to deflect attention from the endless bichon carnage.

  • Ren says:

    "Flame on!"

    I hated that movie.

    "Oh there's a baseless belief not supported by the evidence afoot, all right."

    All right? No, it's not all right. 😉

  • Dee says:

    Lol @Ren. This post isnt tagged "careerism in science". It's tagged #FWDAOTI and I'd say it succeeded

  • Ren says:

    "This post isnt (sic) tagged "careerism in science"."

    No, but the description of the blog is.

    "It's tagged #FWDAOTI and I'd say it succeeded"

    IDK, DI?

  • drugmonkey says:

    IDK, DI?

    Pretty much, yeah.

  • drugmonkey says:

    ... the endless bichon carnage.

    We've been through this, dumbasse. The biased media frequently calls them bichons when they are clearly Yorkshire terriers. Any vet could tell you that.

Leave a Reply